> > > > > > 4.14.102 is still old. > > I agree > > > > > > Porting a 5.1 will take a lot of effort. > > > > > > Then that implies you have an SoC with a few million lines of code added > > > to the kernel, right? Nothing we can do here about that mess, you need > > > to go ask for support from the vendor that is forcing you to use that > > > kernel, sorry :( > > > > > > > Well its at least an x86-64 based SoC. > > An x86 SoC should work on 5.1, what is missing there to keep it from > functioning? Why hasn't it already been updated to 4.19.y? > > thanks, > > greg k-h - Long term stabilisation of product. - Concerns a product update - already in production - A big bunch of testing done on the product - Bug occurence currently "once" - no reproduction Hard work. Best regards Carsten
