On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:30:06PM +0000, Schmid, Carsten wrote: > > > > Wow that's an old kernel. > > > Indeed. Long running project. > > > > > > > Can you reproduce this on a "clean" 5.1 kernel release? > > > As this is an automotive embedded target, we currently have 4.14.102 as the newest custom kernel. > > > > 4.14.102 is still old. > I agree > > > > Porting a 5.1 will take a lot of effort. > > > > Then that implies you have an SoC with a few million lines of code added > > to the kernel, right? Nothing we can do here about that mess, you need > > to go ask for support from the vendor that is forcing you to use that > > kernel, sorry :( > > > > Well its at least an x86-64 based SoC. An x86 SoC should work on 5.1, what is missing there to keep it from functioning? Why hasn't it already been updated to 4.19.y? thanks, greg k-h
