Re: FTDI removal oops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 01:31 +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Ok, good - thanks for testing. Would you care to send that with a
> commit log and your sign-off?

I suppose so, if I drop the addition of cancel_delayed_work_sync() to
ftdi_sio_port_remove(). That doesn't need to be there, AFAICT -- there
can't be any work outstanding unless the device is open anyway. And the
private data structure isn't going away until the device is closed... at
which point the pending work gets flushed appropriately.

If I'm wrong about that and you (Alan) want to do it anyway, you can
come up with your own changelog justifying it :)

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux