RE: [PATCH 1/1] USB: serial: sierra driver performance improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Greg, 

Thanks for that information; we'll work on a series instead of individual ones, but, being new to this, we had a question. We'll be basing our patch series on Linux-Next which is a moving target. For instance, if we take a snapshot of it today and then spend the next few days preparing our patch series, it's likely that Linux-Next will have changed by the time we submit the series. There could be conflicts by then; although this must be a commonplace occurrence, but we're not sure how to handle it. I'm guessing we get another copy of Linux-Next when we're ready to submit and then do a quick check for conflicts, correct?

Regards

Rory

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 4:37 PM
To: Elina Pasheva
Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; Rory Filer; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] USB: serial: sierra driver performance improvements

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:35:37PM -0700, Elina Pasheva wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:48 -0700, Greg KH wrote: 
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:41:49PM -0700, Elina Pasheva wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] USB: serial: sierra driver performance
> > > improvements
> > > From: Elina Pasheva <epasheva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The following is summary of changes we have made to sierra.c driver in
> > > [PATCH 1/1] dealing with performance improvements:
> > > - Version number set to 1.3.4
> > 
> > Hm, you forgot to do this in this patch.  Don't worry, I added it, so
> > that your follow-on patch would apply, but please at least check stuff
> > like this :)
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> Thank you, Greg. Sorry about it, my mistake. 
> 
> We have several more patches to go before we catch up to the version of
> the file we have in our own CVS repository. Most of the changes are
> unrelated and would be sent in different patches. The question is, would
> you prefer that we do them in a series of patches - [nn/mm] - or can we
> continue submitting them one-by-one as separate patches? Whatever
> lightens your workload.

A series is good, I can apply them all at once, and you don't have to
keep changing the version number of the driver for every single patch :)

thanks,

greg k-h

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux