On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:48 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:41:49PM -0700, Elina Pasheva wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] USB: serial: sierra driver performance > > improvements > > From: Elina Pasheva <epasheva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The following is summary of changes we have made to sierra.c driver in > > [PATCH 1/1] dealing with performance improvements: > > - Version number set to 1.3.4 > > Hm, you forgot to do this in this patch. Don't worry, I added it, so > that your follow-on patch would apply, but please at least check stuff > like this :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Thank you, Greg. Sorry about it, my mistake. We have several more patches to go before we catch up to the version of the file we have in our own CVS repository. Most of the changes are unrelated and would be sent in different patches. The question is, would you prefer that we do them in a series of patches - [nn/mm] - or can we continue submitting them one-by-one as separate patches? Whatever lightens your workload. Please note that our patches now are against linux-next as you advised us. Thanks, Elina -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
