On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:35:37PM -0700, Elina Pasheva wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:48 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:41:49PM -0700, Elina Pasheva wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] USB: serial: sierra driver performance > > > improvements > > > From: Elina Pasheva <epasheva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > The following is summary of changes we have made to sierra.c driver in > > > [PATCH 1/1] dealing with performance improvements: > > > - Version number set to 1.3.4 > > > > Hm, you forgot to do this in this patch. Don't worry, I added it, so > > that your follow-on patch would apply, but please at least check stuff > > like this :) > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Thank you, Greg. Sorry about it, my mistake. > > We have several more patches to go before we catch up to the version of > the file we have in our own CVS repository. Most of the changes are > unrelated and would be sent in different patches. The question is, would > you prefer that we do them in a series of patches - [nn/mm] - or can we > continue submitting them one-by-one as separate patches? Whatever > lightens your workload. A series is good, I can apply them all at once, and you don't have to keep changing the version number of the driver for every single patch :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
