On 4/23/2018 14:03, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
The dwm-158 interface 4 and 5 doesn't answer to the AT commands
and doesn't appears a option interface.
Tested on openwrt distribution (kernel 4.14 using the old blacklist
definitions).
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Lippolis <giu.lippolis@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
index c3f252283ab9..f0c3612467a3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
@@ -1911,7 +1911,8 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option_ids[] = {
{ USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d01, 0xff) }, /* D-Link DWM-156 (variant) */
{ USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d02, 0xff) },
{ USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d03, 0xff) },
- { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d04, 0xff) }, /* D-Link DWM-158 */
+ { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d04, 0xff), /* D-Link DWM-158 */
+ .driver_info = RSVD(4) | RSVD(5) },
{ USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d0e, 0xff) }, /* D-Link DWM-157 C1 */
{ USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7e19, 0xff), /* D-Link DWM-221 B1 */
.driver_info = RSVD(4) },
Blacklisting interface 4 and 5 is correct because:
MI_00 D-Link Mobile Broadband Device (cdc_ether)
MI_02 D-Link HSPA+DataCard Diagnostics Interface (also ppp modem)
MI_03 D-Link HSPA+DataCard NMEA Device
MI_04 D-Link HSPA+DataCard Speech Port
MI_05 D-Link HSPA+DataCard Debug Port
MI_06 USB Mass Storage Device
rgds
/Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
