On Friday 27 March 2009, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > > Something you're more likely to run into is the ep0out test > > case failure I saw. Again, it *might* be specific to my > > test setup ... the first (64 byte) data packet got written > > to the peripheral, from then on it was ping/nak until the > > request timed out and got aborted. Specific to "test 14". > > Test 14...that's the control OUT test, right? I think it used to work, Yeah, I thought so too. > but I guess it's one of the transfer types most likely to regress since > many gadgets don't require such transfers. Gadget zero, for testing; and the RNDIS/Ethernet link. Most AVR32AP boards have Real Ethernet links. :) > I've been doing a bit of bare-metal USB programming on UC3 chips > lately...I guess I should take a look and see if anything looks stupid > in the light of that additional experience... Those have the full-speed OTG controller that some AVR8 chips have, yes? There might be something. But these two PING/NAK issues couldn't show up at full speed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
