On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:28:42PM +0300, Maksim Salau wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:04:24 +0200 > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 07:24:37PM +0300, Maksim Salau wrote: > > > Allocate buffers on HEAP instead of STACK for local structures > > > that are to be received using usb_control_msg(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maksim Salau <maksim.salau@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Tested-by: Alfredo Rafael Vicente Boix <alviboi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > This patch does not apply to usb-next, what did you make it against? > > > > Can you rebase it and resend? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Hi Greg, > > I've created the patch against linux-stable v4.10.12. I've checked history > of the driver and it turns out that the patch conflicts with > 9b181166f17534a82b4b628b13e524a893715dfc > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/drivers/usb/misc/legousbtower.c?h=usb-next&id=9b181166f17534a82b4b628b13e524a893715dfc > > There are no conflicting changes, but context has changed. > I'll rebase and resend shortly. > > The same patch can't be used for stable and for usb-next anymore. Is there > any chance to backport the fix for stable? Yes, we can backport it, I'll mark it for stable and do the backport when it hits Linus's tree after 4.12-rc1 is out. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
