On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 04:16:53PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 20 February 2009, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > ISTR that needed to be reissued against mainline; the patch I > > > saw was against some older code. (And didn't he have some other > > > bugfix too?) > > > > he did, here it is (updated as he made a patch -p0 version): > > > > >From 96da2c37a19e3a003ba0484af129e66c13d9b81f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Giuseppe GORGOGLIONE <giuseppe.gorgoglione@xxxxxx> > > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:35:43 +0200 > > Saturday is *tomorrow* ... you and your silly timezone! ;) hehe, working late :-p > I'll bundle this with the patches I send for 2.6.30, assuming > this is the patch I'm thinking of: comes up only with static > FIFO config, not the dynamic FIFO support. The problem he found was only with static FIFO (ep_config_from hw()). -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
