Hi John, > John Youn <John.Youn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> hat am 18. August 2016 um 20:03 > geschrieben: > > > On 8/17/2016 3:17 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote: > > Hi John, > > > >> John Youn <John.Youn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> hat am 17. August 2016 um 23:21 > >> geschrieben: > >> > >> > >> ... > >> Ok, yeah, that seems better. > >> > >> Can you check if applying just patch 2 and 3 solves the issue? If so I > >> think we can send those upstream. > > > > unfortunately not: > > Ok. I'll see if I can come up with a more conservative version of > patch 4 until I can look at it properly. I'll try to get to this > sometime next week but I may not be able to get to it until later. Great > > In the meantime, specifying the fifo sizes as you've done can serve as > a workaround. Beside of this workaround, do you see any benefit of patch 2/6 from my series? I don't want to introduce DT properties which are only useful for workarounds? Thanks Stefan > > Regards, > John > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
