alloc_ordered_workqueue replaces the deprecated
create_singlethread_workqueue.
The workqueue "workqueue" has multiple workitems which may require
ordering. Hence, a dedicated ordered workqueue has been used.
Since the workqueue is not being used on a memory reclaim path,
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has not been set.
Can the workitems run concurrently? Is the ordering among work items necessary?
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/host/whci/init.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/whci/init.c b/drivers/usb/host/whci/init.c
index e363723..ad8eb57 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/whci/init.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/whci/init.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ int whc_init(struct whc *whc)
init_waitqueue_head(&whc->cmd_wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&whc->async_list_wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&whc->periodic_list_wq);
- whc->workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue(dev_name(&whc->umc->dev));
+ whc->workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(&whc->umc->dev), 0);
if (whc->workqueue == NULL) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto error;
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
