alloc_ordered_workqueue replaces the deprecated
create_singlethread_workqueue.
The workqueue "workqueue" has multiple workitems which may require
ordering. Hence, a dedicated ordered workqueue has been used.
Since the workqueue is not being used on a memory reclaim path,
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has not been set.
Can the workitems run concurrently? Is the ordering among work items
necessary?
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
index 43d5293..cbde189 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
@@ -3206,7 +3206,7 @@ static int __init u132_hcd_init(void)
if (usb_disabled())
return -ENODEV;
printk(KERN_INFO "driver %s\n", hcd_name);
- workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue("u132");
+ workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("u132", 0);
retval = platform_driver_register(&u132_platform_driver);
return retval;
}
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
