Re: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: USB Type-C Connector Class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:41:28AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:45:09PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > For consistency, should this be either type-c/type-c.c or
> > > typec/typec.c?
> > 
> > For some reason I like to have the dash in the folder name, but I
> > don't like the idea that the port driver would be in form
> > type-c_something. I would prefer them to be named typec_something. Or
> > maybe just "something" and also name the typec.c maybe class.c or
> > core.c.
> > 
> > Is this a big problem? I guess we could just name the folder "typec".
> > Guenter, whats your opinion?
> 
> "typec" please.

OK, typec it is.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux