Hi, On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:20:01PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2016-05-19 15:44:54, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > The purpose of this class is to provide unified interface for user > > space to get the status and basic information about USB Type-C > > Connectors in the system, control data role swapping, and when USB PD > > is available, also power role swapping and Alternate Modes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/usb/Kconfig | 2 + > > drivers/usb/Makefile | 2 + > > drivers/usb/type-c/Kconfig | 7 + > > drivers/usb/type-c/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/usb/type-c/typec.c | 957 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > For consistency, should this be either type-c/type-c.c or > typec/typec.c? For some reason I like to have the dash in the folder name, but I don't like the idea that the port driver would be in form type-c_something. I would prefer them to be named typec_something. Or maybe just "something" and also name the typec.c maybe class.c or core.c. Is this a big problem? I guess we could just name the folder "typec". Guenter, whats your opinion? Thanks, -- heikki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
