Sam Sany <saam.r.sany@...> writes:
No go. Just booted into the newly compiled kernel, and I still have the
exact same symptoms. The edited portion of the hub.c file I used to
compile looks as such:
int usb_device_supports_lpm(struct usb_device *udev)
{
return 0;
/* USB 2.1 (and greater) devices indicate LPM support through
* their USB 2.0 Extended Capabilities BOS descriptor.
*/
/* Some devices have trouble with LPM */
if (udev->quirks & USB_QUIRK_NO_LPM)
return 0;
/* USB 2.1 (and greater) devices indicate LPM support through
* their USB 2.0 Extended Capabilities BOS descriptor.
*/
if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH || udev->speed == USB_SPEED_FULL)
{
if (udev->bos->ext_cap &&
(USB_LPM_SUPPORT &
le32_to_cpu(udev->bos->ext_cap->bmAttributes)))
return 1;
return 0;
}
/*
* According to the USB 3.0 spec, all USB 3.0 devices must support
LPM.
* However, there are some that don't, and they set the U1/U2 exit
* latencies to zero.
*/
if (!udev->bos->ss_cap) {
dev_info(&udev->dev, "No LPM exit latency info found,
disabling LPM.\n");
return 0;
}
if (udev->bos->ss_cap->bU1devExitLat == 0 &&
udev->bos->ss_cap->bU2DevExitLat == 0) {
if (udev->parent)
dev_info(&udev->dev, "LPM exit latency is zeroed,
disabling LPM.\n");
else
dev_info(&udev->dev, "We don't know the algorithms
for LPM for this host, disabling LPM.\n");
return 0;
}
if (!udev->parent || udev->parent->lpm_capable)
return 1;
return 0;
}
Did I do something wrong? The dmesg output is identical to before :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
