On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Mikolaj Ch wrote: > Hi, > > I have a composite usb device where order of binding the drivers to > interfaces matters. > When the device is plugged in binding is from 0-th till n-th interface > but in usb_reset_device function in /drivers/usb/core/hub.c after > reset binding is done in revers order from n-th till 0. > Is there a reason for doing so ? You are reading the code wrong. usb_reset_device() calls the post_reset methods of the interface drivers in reverse order, but the rebinding is done by rebind_marked_interfaces() in driver.c in forward order. Alan Stern > Can I expect any disadvantages after changing this order to be from 0 > till n-th ? > > I know that the easiest solution is to claim the device driver is > badly written but I don't have a possibility to change it so I want to > know if changing this order in usb cored driver is possible without > affecting other functionality. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
