Hi, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes: > ixp4xx and pxa25x both use this driver and provide a slightly > different set of register definitions for it. Aside from that, > the definition in the ixp4xx-regs.h header conflicts with the > on in the pxa27x device driver when compile-testing that: > > In file included from ../drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pxa27x_udc.c:37:0: > ../drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pxa27x_udc.h:26:0: warning: "UDCCR" redefined > #define UDCCR 0x0000 /* UDC Control Register */ > ^ > In file included from ../arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/hardware.h:27:0, > from ../arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h:18, > from ../arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:194, > from ../include/linux/io.h:25, > from ../include/linux/irq.h:24, > from ../drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pxa27x_udc.c:23: > ../arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/ixp4xx-regs.h:415:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition > #define UDCCR IXP4XX_USB_REG(IXP4XX_USB_BASE_VIRT+0x0000) > > This addresses both issues by moving all the definitions into the > pxa25x_udc driver itself. It turns out the only difference between > them was 'UDCCS_IO_ROF', and that could well be a mistake when it > was incorrectly copied from pxa25x to ixp4xx. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> FYI, this series now sits in my testing/next. If you could just check that I didn't mess anything up, I'd be glad. Thanks -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
