On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 12:55 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 09:59 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> > Heimdall could easily unbind the cdc_acm driver from the device when > >> > it wants to communicate directly with the endpoints and not going > >> > through the created ttyACM device. > >> > >> It already does that: > > > > Thus the question: Is that sufficient for 04e8:6601 and 04e8:68c3 ? > > Let's assume so. I haven't seen any of these device IDs used for > firmware updates. And according to Lars, they are used for other ACM > devices. The heimdall support for these two IDs could be bogus. It's > very easy to get false reports for devices juggling device IDs around. Very well. Then this case is closed successfully. Thank you Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
