Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 09:59 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> > Heimdall could easily unbind the cdc_acm driver from the device when >> > it wants to communicate directly with the endpoints and not going >> > through the created ttyACM device. >> >> It already does that: > > Thus the question: Is that sufficient for 04e8:6601 and 04e8:68c3 ? Let's assume so. I haven't seen any of these device IDs used for firmware updates. And according to Lars, they are used for other ACM devices. The heimdall support for these two IDs could be bogus. It's very easy to get false reports for devices juggling device IDs around. Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
