Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] usb: misc: usbtest: add bulk queue test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:23:39AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Peter Chen wrote:
> 
> > The bulk queue tests are used to show 'best performance' for bulk
> > transfer, we are often asked this question by users.
> > 
> > It's result should be very close to IC simulation, in order
> > to get that, the device side should also need to prepare enough
> > queue.
> > 
> > We have got the 'best performance' (IN: ~41MB, OUT: ~39MB) at i.mx platform
> > (USB2, ARM Cortex A9) with below command:
> > 
> > Host side:
> > modprobe usbtest
> > ./testusb -a -t 27 -g 64 -s 16384
> > ./testusb -a -t 28 -g 64 -s 16384
> > Gadget side:
> > modprobe g_zero loopdefault=1 qlen=64 buflen=16384
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > I am not sure if it is good to reuse iso structure, so I take
> > it as RFC. If reuse is accepted, I will rename the iso
> > structures to common one.
> > 
> >  drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> > index ad6dd4a..f1faeb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> >  static int override_alt = -1;
> >  module_param_named(alt, override_alt, int, 0644);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(alt, ">= 0 to override altsetting selection");
> > +static void iso_callback(struct urb *urb);
> >  
> >  /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> >  
> > @@ -239,7 +240,8 @@ static struct urb *usbtest_alloc_urb(
> >  	unsigned long		bytes,
> >  	unsigned		transfer_flags,
> >  	unsigned		offset,
> > -	u8			bInterval)
> > +	u8			bInterval,
> > +	bool			queue_callback)
> 
> Should this be named "is_iso" instead?  It would be be more clear.
> 

ISO transfer uses different function iso_alloc_urb to allocate urb,
the reason we need one more parameter at usbtest_alloc_urb is we
use different callback for simple polling bulk transfer and
interrupt-triggered bulk transfer.

So, do you agree I reuse the iso structures to implement it? 

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux