Hi,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:37:26PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> Add usb phy controller for hi6220 platform
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++
> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c | 306 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 316 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> index ccad880..40a1ef1 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -162,6 +162,15 @@ config PHY_HIX5HD2_SATA
> help
> Support for SATA PHY on Hisilicon hix5hd2 Soc.
>
> +config PHY_HI6220_USB
> + tristate "hi6220 USB PHY support"
> + select USB_PHY
> + select MFD_SYSCON
> + help
> + Enable this to support the HISILICON HI6220 USB PHY.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here.
> +
> config PHY_SUN4I_USB
> tristate "Allwinner sunxi SoC USB PHY driver"
> depends on ARCH_SUNXI && HAS_IOMEM && OF
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
> index aa74f96..ec43c2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TI_PIPE3) += phy-ti-pipe3.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TWL4030_USB) += phy-twl4030-usb.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_SATA) += phy-exynos5250-sata.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_HIX5HD2_SATA) += phy-hix5hd2-sata.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_HI6220_USB) += phy-hi6220-usb.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_SUN4I_USB) += phy-sun4i-usb.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_SAMSUNG_USB2) += phy-exynos-usb2.o
> phy-exynos-usb2-y += phy-samsung-usb2.o
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c b/drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0d9f5ac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-hi6220-usb.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 Linaro Ltd.
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 Hisilicon Limited.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/usb/gadget.h>
> +#include <linux/usb/otg.h>
> +
> +#define SC_PERIPH_CTRL4 0x00c
> +
> +#define CTRL4_PICO_SIDDQ BIT(6)
> +#define CTRL4_PICO_OGDISABLE BIT(8)
> +#define CTRL4_PICO_VBUSVLDEXT BIT(10)
> +#define CTRL4_PICO_VBUSVLDEXTSEL BIT(11)
> +#define CTRL4_OTG_PHY_SEL BIT(21)
> +
> +#define SC_PERIPH_CTRL5 0x010
> +
> +#define CTRL5_USBOTG_RES_SEL BIT(3)
> +#define CTRL5_PICOPHY_ACAENB BIT(4)
> +#define CTRL5_PICOPHY_BC_MODE BIT(5)
> +#define CTRL5_PICOPHY_CHRGSEL BIT(6)
> +#define CTRL5_PICOPHY_VDATSRCEND BIT(7)
> +#define CTRL5_PICOPHY_VDATDETENB BIT(8)
> +#define CTRL5_PICOPHY_DCDENB BIT(9)
> +#define CTRL5_PICOPHY_IDDIG BIT(10)
> +
> +#define SC_PERIPH_CTRL8 0x018
> +#define SC_PERIPH_RSTEN0 0x300
> +#define SC_PERIPH_RSTDIS0 0x304
> +
> +#define RST0_USBOTG_BUS BIT(4)
> +#define RST0_POR_PICOPHY BIT(5)
> +#define RST0_USBOTG BIT(6)
> +#define RST0_USBOTG_32K BIT(7)
> +
> +#define EYE_PATTERN_PARA 0x7053348c
> +
> +struct hi6220_priv {
> + struct usb_phy phy;
> + struct delayed_work work;
> + struct regmap *reg;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + struct regulator *vcc;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int gpio_vbus;
> + int gpio_id;
> + enum usb_otg_state state;
> +};
> +
> +static void hi6220_start_peripheral(struct hi6220_priv *priv, bool on)
> +{
> + struct usb_otg *otg = priv->phy.otg;
> +
> + if (!otg->gadget)
> + return;
> +
> + if (on)
> + usb_gadget_connect(otg->gadget);
> + else
> + usb_gadget_disconnect(otg->gadget);
why is the PHY fiddling with pullups ?
> +}
> +
> +static void hi6220_detect_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct hi6220_priv *priv =
> + container_of(work, struct hi6220_priv, work.work);
> + int gpio_id, gpio_vbus;
> + enum usb_otg_state state;
> +
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(priv->gpio_id) || !gpio_is_valid(priv->gpio_vbus))
> + return;
> +
> + gpio_id = gpio_get_value_cansleep(priv->gpio_id);
> + gpio_vbus = gpio_get_value_cansleep(priv->gpio_vbus);
looks like this should be using extcon
> +
> + if (gpio_vbus == 0) {
> + if (gpio_id == 1)
> + state = OTG_STATE_B_PERIPHERAL;
> + else
> + state = OTG_STATE_A_HOST;
> + } else {
> + state = OTG_STATE_A_HOST;
> + }
> +
> + if (priv->state != state) {
> + hi6220_start_peripheral(priv, state == OTG_STATE_B_PERIPHERAL);
> + priv->state = state;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t hiusb_gpio_intr(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct hi6220_priv *priv = (struct hi6220_priv *)data;
> +
> + /* add debounce time */
> + schedule_delayed_work(&priv->work, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
this is really bad. We have threaded interrupt support, right ?
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
