On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:27:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > > In current state I review all 3 patches as: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rejected-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > [It breaks booting Nokia N900 device] > > > > > > > > > > > > next step, figure why it's broken. Working just fine here > > > > > > on AM335x which has the same musb IP. > > > > > > > > > > Why is broken? That is easy. You send 3 patches which broke > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > Actually when I reverted only that patch which adds line: > > > > > > > > pm_runtime_irq_safe(musb->controller) > > > > > > > > then early boot crash disappeared. > > > > > > > > But other two patches did not fixed support for external .ko > > > > gadget modules. State is same -- crash after modprobe. > > > > > > Here is crash from qemu when musb is compiled into kernel: > > > > > > [ 0.641662] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 > > > [ 0.642211] pgd = c0004000 > ... > > > [ 0.672882] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b > > > [ 0.672882] > > > > > > Reason why it crashes is because when function > > > omap2430_runtime_resume() is called pointer to functions > > > musb_readl and musb_writel are both NULL. And so NULL pointer > > > dereference. > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git/commit/?h=testing/next&id=1861a2c60351a390272b3395f4d88480cdfd9e58 > > > > So you commit a fix to your internal branch without telling Pali, who > is actively debugging same problem at the same time, and then you just > send him url without at least saying "sorry"? grow up... why do I have to say sorry for fixing a problem ? Why do I have to let you know I committed something to my branch ? It's the middle of the merge window, nothing will happen until -rc1 is out, at which point I'll send this to the mailing list before sending a pull request to Greg. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
