On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:22:02 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Mark Knibbs wrote: > > > ... > > It looks like the 5000 timeout in usb_stor_euscsi_init() should be replaced > > by 5*HZ then? > > Yes, it does look wrong. There may be other places that also call the > function with a timeout value in ms rather than jiffies... The only other function that I could see with that problem is usb_stor_huawei_e220_init(), also in drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c It uses 1000 for timeout, which presumably should be HZ (or 1*HZ to make things clearer?). Any idea why the two similar functions have different ways of specifying the timeout? Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
