Re: [RFC 0/2] Support for Super Speed Link Layer Test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Pratyush Anand wrote:

> > How about just creating a normal USB device instead of a platform 
> > device?  I think all you have to do is make usb_new_device() avoid 
> > calling usb_enumerate_device() when the new flag is set.
> 
> I had thought of this. But, I had found that even hub_port_reset
> creates issue for LVS device. hub_port_reset forces USB SS link to go
> into recovery very soon, which is not expected as per Link Layer Test
> specification. So, we can not even allow to execute hub_port_init when
> a LVS device is connected.
> 
> > 
> > Also, instead of adding a new quirk flag to every single USB device, 
> > you probably should use something that is hcd-specific.  Then xhci-hcd 
> > could register the new sysfs file, and it wouldn't be present for other 
> > controller types or non-root hubs.
> 
> That I will look into. Should be doable.

Here's another idea: Unbind the hub driver from the root hub and
replace it with an LVS-specific driver.  That would require essentially
no changes to the existing code in usbcore.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux