On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Hans de Goede wrote: > I agree that usb-Xhci would be the best compatible strings to use. > > The problem with usb-ehci is that there already is a ppc specific driver binding to that > compatible string, doing various ppc specific controller initialization. > > Thinking more about this, there is one possible solution though, the ehci-ppc-of.c is > guarded in Kconfig with: > > depends on PPC_OF > > If we add an inverted check to the Kconfig option for platform-ehci.c, ie: > > config USB_EHCI_HCD_PLATFORM > tristate "Generic EHCI driver for a platform device" > depends on !PPC_OF > > Then we can be certain that we don't end up with 2 drivers claiming the > usb-ehci compatible on ppc platforms. I've done some quick research > and it seems that ehci-platform.c is only used on arm and mips devices, so > excluding its use on ppc should not be an issue. > > Then later on someone, who has the actual hardware to test, can merge the > ppc specific quirk handling into ehci-platform,c and ehci-ppc-of.c can go > away entirely. > > Alan, if you agree this is the best way forward, I'll do a v5 with the proposed > changes. That's okay with me. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
