On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 15:07, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Anyway, let's focus on what you would like best. > > > > > > If you prefer to just fix the regression, it is doable. > > > > > > If you prefer the upperdirfd, workdirfd, lowerdirfd API, I think we can > > > > > > find a volunteer to write it up. > > Can't the existing option names be overloaded if a separate cmd > (FSCONFIG_SET_PATH or FSCONFIG_SET_PATH_EMPTY) is used in fsconfig()? Looked and there's nothing in the uAPI that would prevent overloading the existing names. However the internal fs_parse() API only allows a single type associated with a name. That could be changed if we want. I think it would make more sense than adding newer names that are not in sync with the command line usage and existing documentation. I can look into that if there's no objection. Thanks, Miklos
