Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:50:00 -0600
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>, overlayfs <linux-unionfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAOQ4uxib1YhfP3Pk5s_T7yWXg5iFtLHNMtaVAsBJVJuWdiiwcw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 1:29 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm lost in the maze of distros and containers.
> Will wait for more info.

The bolt test suite failure looks like it fuse-overlayfs related. It
happens with (rootless) podman but not when using sudo podman.

https://github.com/containers/fuse-overlayfs/issues/287

-- 
Chris Murphy

References:
- btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Chris Murphy
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Amir Goldstein
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Chris Murphy
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Amir Goldstein
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Chris Murphy
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Chris Murphy
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Chris Murphy
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Chris Murphy
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Chris Murphy
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Amir Goldstein
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Chris Murphy
- Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
  - From: Amir Goldstein

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ovl: check VM_DENYWRITE mappings in copy-up
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 7/9] ovl: cache dirty overlayfs' inode
Previous by thread: Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
Next by thread: Re: btrfs+overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling back to index=off and metacopy=off.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems Devel] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]