On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:59 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yeh, it's mostly the same. Branch ovl-ino is already rebased. > > > If you have no other comments, I'll prepare v2 and test it with 5.6-rc2. > > > > Thanks. I've already applied the patches leading up to this and just > > pushed to #overlayfs-next. > > > > OK, I'll rebase the rest on top of that. > While you are here, what do you think about: > ovl: enable xino automatically in more cases > > Do you agree with that minor change of behavior? I haven't thought about that yet. > > BTW, I see that overlayfs-next allows all remote fs as upper, > without extra restrictions. > I guess you are not too worried about implications? > Or intend to fix that up before the merge window? No, I'm not too worried, but if you send a patch, I'm not against restricting it either. Thanks, Miklos
