> > Yeh, it's mostly the same. Branch ovl-ino is already rebased. > > If you have no other comments, I'll prepare v2 and test it with 5.6-rc2. > > Thanks. I've already applied the patches leading up to this and just > pushed to #overlayfs-next. > OK, I'll rebase the rest on top of that. While you are here, what do you think about: ovl: enable xino automatically in more cases Do you agree with that minor change of behavior? BTW, I see that overlayfs-next allows all remote fs as upper, without extra restrictions. I guess you are not too worried about implications? Or intend to fix that up before the merge window? Thanks, Amir.
