Re: [PATCH 10/10] ovl: follow decoded origin file handle of merge dir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Aren't we allowed to update the stale index?
>>
>> The answer is no, of course (otherwise client would get success for
>> something it should get error for).  Eeturning ESTALE is the right
>> thing to do.
>
> Can encode an overlay-generation in the handle.  That would allow us
> to have a stale index as well as a new one for the same underlying
> origin.
>

Yes, we can do that.

We will never have two different index generations on-disk at the same time.
A new generation index always obsoletes an old index generation
(index name does not include the generation).

Verifying index/origin consistency should happen no later than at encode time,
but it really doesn't cost much to verify that at merge dir lookup time.
If index/origin is not consistent with merge dir upper/lower, need to replace it
with a newer generation consistent index and need to update origin xattr.
I would think that it also makes sense to verify index->upper->origin->index
consistency on mount, as we anyway should check that index->upper reference
is not stale.

But I must wonder: does carrying this extra complexity for index generation
really worth the effort of not changing behavior of modified lower dir
(when user opts-in for the change with index=on)?
Do you think there are users out there depending on the current behavior
in a setup that does NOT involve copying layers??

Anyway, another not-really-a-reason I am wondering if we can avoid
index generation is that I was going to use struct ovl_fh for both on-disk
(origin xattr and index name) and for on-wire (NFS), so I'm still resisting
the idea to diverge the structs...

Thanks,
Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux