On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Aren't we allowed to update the stale index? > > The answer is no, of course (otherwise client would get success for > something it should get error for). Eeturning ESTALE is the right > thing to do. Can encode an overlay-generation in the handle. That would allow us to have a stale index as well as a new one for the same underlying origin. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
