On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Alexander Aring wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 2:26 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:59:50 +0100 (CET) > > Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Better yet, I'm hoping to get some time to finish looking at the python > > > > updates that were sent to me, and where it could be possible to just allow > > > > you to override the output with a python script. > > > > > > OK, no hurry. I looked into the plugins, but they seem to control only > > > part of the output and it seems that one would be needed for every type of > > > event. I could try writing python, if there is an example. > > > > The python plugins are currently broken, and we started adding more > > features to the plugins to control the output a bit more. > > what about the python bindings (under trace-cmd/python/) to parse > trace files and using the python csv module? I guess the python What do you mean by parse? My only goal is to reduce running time, so parsing the existing output to produce a csv file won't be a benefit. thanks, julia > bindings are something different than the python plugins and they are > still working? > > - Alex > >
|