On Mon, 13 Mar 2023, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:40:16 +0100 (CET) > Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Thanks for the patch. But actually, I was hoping for something like this: > > > > cpus=96 > > <...>-20420,074,3057.962369,sched_process_exec,/tmp/tmp2abf06.sh,20420,20420 > > <...>-20420,074,3057.963487,sched_switch,tmp2abf06.sh,20420,120,D,swapper/74,0,120 > > <idle>-0,034,3057.963602,sched_waking,kworker/u192,6,500,120,075 > > <idle>-0,075,3057.963632,sched_wakeup,kworker/u192,6,500,120,075 > > <idle>-0,075,3057.963637,sched_switch,swapper/75,0,120,R,kworker/u192,6,500,120 > > kworker/u192,6-500,075,3057.963656,sched_waking,tmp2abf06.sh,20420,120,074 > > kworker/u192,6-500,075,3057.963665,sched_switch,kworker/u192,6,500,120,W,swapper/75,0,120 > > <idle>-0,074,3057.963686,sched_wakeup,tmp2abf06.sh,20420,120,074 > > <idle>-0,074,3057.963691,sched_switch,swapper/74,0,120,R,tmp2abf06.sh,20420,120 > > > > It still remains human readable (more or less, with practice), but there > > are not a lot of spaces that a parser has to get rid of. The separator > > character would have to be something that can't occur in a command name. > > Should be rather trivial to implement. > > Better yet, I'm hoping to get some time to finish looking at the python > updates that were sent to me, and where it could be possible to just allow > you to override the output with a python script. OK, no hurry. I looked into the plugins, but they seem to control only part of the output and it seems that one would be needed for every type of event. I could try writing python, if there is an example. thanks, julia
|