Re: PATCH [0/4] perf: clean-up of power events API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 10/8/2010 11:28 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Mathieu Desnoyers<mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

* Arjan van de Ven (arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
  On 10/8/2010 1:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
The fundamental thing about tracing/instrumentation is that there
are no deep ABI needs: it's all about analyzing development kernels
(and a few select versions that get the enterprise treatment) but
otherwise the half-life of this kind of information is very short.

So we dont want to tie ourselves down with excessive ABIs.
ok I'll start working on a second mechanism then to export
information that applications need ;-( it'll look a lot like tracing
I suppose ;-(
What's wrong with doing the compatibility layer in a LGPL library
shipped with the kernel tree under tools/ ? Why does everything *have*
to be done in kernel-space ? Why are you so focused on making your
application interact directly with kernel ABIs ?
The thing is, Arjan is 100% right that a library for this is not a
'solution', it's an unnecessary complication.

What i suggested in my mail was to _keep existing events_. I.e. do not
break powertop. We are 100% happy that we _have_ such apps, and we
should do reasonable things to not break them.

If we need to change events, we can add a new event. The old events will
lose their relevance without us having to do much - and without us
having to break powertop, pytimechart, etc. We can even have periods of
overlap when both events are available - to give instrumentation apps
time to learn the new events.

I.e. it's not an ABI in the classic sense - we do not (because we
cannot) guarantee the infinite availability of these events. But we can
guarantee that the fields do not change in some stupid, avoidable way.

also I have to say that some events are more likely to change than others

"function foo in the kernel called" is more likely to change than "the processor went to THIS frequency". The concept of CPU frequencies has been with us fora long time and is going to be there for a long time as well ......

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux