Re: Remove traceevent from tools/lib
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Remove traceevent from tools/lib
- From: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:52:06 -0800
- Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20221117134250.532a44c9@gandalf.local.home>
- References: <CAP-5=fWxAjEia-Qbm0RVzKOxyiod8rUOBieqaGK=DtQboDe3Qw@mail.gmail.com> <20221117134250.532a44c9@gandalf.local.home>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:42 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:59:46 -0800
> Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Means that perf is cleanly(ish) separated from libraries in tools/lib.
> > traceevent in tools/lib is out of date (~2years - version 1.1.0 whilst
> > the latest is 1.6.3 [1]) . Should we delete traceevent from tools/lib
>
> Yes please!
>
> Strongly-acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I sent v1 patches:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221117224952.358639-1-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks,
Ian
> -- Steve
>
> > and just make LIBTRACEEVENT_DYNAMIC the only supported perf build
> > option? I guess this may break old distributions that may not have
> > libtraceevent, but even so I'm not sure that should motivate not
> > cleaning this up (if they are building perf they can build
> > libtraceevent).
>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]