Re: Remove traceevent from tools/lib
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Remove traceevent from tools/lib
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:42:50 -0500
- Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAP-5=fWxAjEia-Qbm0RVzKOxyiod8rUOBieqaGK=DtQboDe3Qw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAP-5=fWxAjEia-Qbm0RVzKOxyiod8rUOBieqaGK=DtQboDe3Qw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:59:46 -0800
Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Means that perf is cleanly(ish) separated from libraries in tools/lib.
> traceevent in tools/lib is out of date (~2years - version 1.1.0 whilst
> the latest is 1.6.3 [1]) . Should we delete traceevent from tools/lib
Yes please!
Strongly-acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-- Steve
> and just make LIBTRACEEVENT_DYNAMIC the only supported perf build
> option? I guess this may break old distributions that may not have
> libtraceevent, but even so I'm not sure that should motivate not
> cleaning this up (if they are building perf they can build
> libtraceevent).
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
