* Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2017-10-27 15:58 UTC+02:00, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:06:25AM -0700, tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker > > wrote: > >> + isolcpus= [KNL,SMP] Isolate a given set of CPUs from disturbance. > >> + Format: [flag-list,]<cpu-list> > >> + > >> + Specify one or more CPUs to isolate from disturbances > >> + specified in the flag list (default: domain): > >> + > >> + nohz > >> + Disable the tick when a single task runs. > >> + domain > >> + Isolate from the general SMP balancing and scheduling > >> + algorithms. This option is the preferred way to isolate > >> + CPUs from tasks. > > > > I _strongly_ object to this statement, isolcpus is _not_ the preferred > > way, cpusets are. > > > > And yes, while cpusets suffers some problems, we _should_ really fix > > those and not promote this piece of shit isolcpus crap. > > I definitely agree with that so your position is a relief :-) This > patch only indented the existing parameter documentation so fixing its > content was beyond its scope. I'll send a patch to correct the text. Since it was the last commit in tip:sched/core that was pushed out just hours ago I zapped that last commit, please send an updated patch which we can apply and get a clean series. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|