2017-10-27 19:06 UTC+02:00, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > * Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> 2017-10-27 15:58 UTC+02:00, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:06:25AM -0700, tip-bot for Frederic >> > Weisbecker >> > wrote: >> >> + isolcpus= [KNL,SMP] Isolate a given set of CPUs from disturbance. >> >> + Format: [flag-list,]<cpu-list> >> >> + >> >> + Specify one or more CPUs to isolate from disturbances >> >> + specified in the flag list (default: domain): >> >> + >> >> + nohz >> >> + Disable the tick when a single task runs. >> >> + domain >> >> + Isolate from the general SMP balancing and scheduling >> >> + algorithms. This option is the preferred way to isolate >> >> + CPUs from tasks. >> > >> > I _strongly_ object to this statement, isolcpus is _not_ the preferred >> > way, cpusets are. >> > >> > And yes, while cpusets suffers some problems, we _should_ really fix >> > those and not promote this piece of shit isolcpus crap. >> >> I definitely agree with that so your position is a relief :-) This >> patch only indented the existing parameter documentation so fixing its >> content was beyond its scope. I'll send a patch to correct the text. > > Since it was the last commit in tip:sched/core that was pushed out just > hours ago > I zapped that last commit, please send an updated patch which we can apply > and get > a clean series. > > Thanks, Note the issue was there before that patch. But nevermind I'll resend an updated version of the patch. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|