On Fri, 2017-10-27 at 15:58 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:06:25AM -0700, tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > + isolcpus= [KNL,SMP] Isolate a given set of CPUs from disturbance. > > + Format: [flag-list,]<cpu-list> > > + > > + Specify one or more CPUs to isolate from disturbances > > + specified in the flag list (default: domain): > > + > > + nohz > > + Disable the tick when a single task runs. > > + domain > > + Isolate from the general SMP balancing and scheduling > > + algorithms. This option is the preferred way to isolate > > + CPUs from tasks. > > I _strongly_ object to this statement, isolcpus is _not_ the preferred > way, cpusets are. > > And yes, while cpusets suffers some problems, we _should_ really fix > those and not promote this piece of shit isolcpus crap. +1, isolcpus is the dinosaur that just won't frickn' die. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|