Re: [tip:sched/numa] sched/numa: Introduce sys_numa_{t,m}bind()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:sched/numa] sched/numa: Introduce sys_numa_{t,m}bind()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:40:10 +0200
- Cc: mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pjt@xxxxxxxxxx, cl@xxxxxxxxx, bharata.rao@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx, aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx, danms@xxxxxxxxxx, suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1337355341.573.68.camel@twins>
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 17:35 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I've also said many times over that I absolutely detest all the async
> stuff because it messes up accounting. And until someone comes up with a
> sane means of sorting that I'll stick to migrate-on-fault.
The other nice advantage of migrate-on-fault is that you don't have to
play lifetime games with vmas. This much simplifies that aspect.
Again, simple things first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
