Re: [tip:sched/numa] sched/numa: Introduce sys_numa_{t,m}bind()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:sched/numa] sched/numa: Introduce sys_numa_{t,m}bind()
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:37:40 -0500 (CDT)
- Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pjt@xxxxxxxxxx, bharata.rao@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx, aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx, danms@xxxxxxxxxx, suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1337355223.573.66.camel@twins>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Most of that is due to existing interfaces, I'm afraid we cannot
> simplify without reducing those :/
I think some change to those would also be appropriate. Those have grown
over a long time and there are some areas of problematic integration with
the scheduler, numa policies and cpusets etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
