On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:49:42 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 02/23/2010 12:20 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: > >> Are there any downsides to Roland's patch as far as PARISC is concerned > >> (apart from the loss of some functionality, of course)? > > > > Kyle ACK'd my parisc patch, and my impression is he wants it to go in > > and does not plan to work on the necessary arch support imminently. > > > > I think the only visible effect of turning off HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > > on parisc will be that /proc/pid/syscall is not available. > > Added to tip:x86/ptrace. And Linus actually put it in his tree yesterday ... commit 15cbf627abcd93c3c668d5a92d58d9fec8f953dd "Revert "parisc: HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK"" -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpLlcrXEQmFr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|