Re: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET)
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:20:30 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: Stephen Rothwell's message of Tuesday, 23 February 2010 10:59:59 +1100 <20100223105959.a50dbe11.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20100211195614.886724710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <tip-2225a122ae26d542bdce523d9d87a4a7ba10e07b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100222090710.GA31357@xxxxxxx> <20100222203319.8bd497a2.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100222102745.GJ20844@xxxxxxx> <20100222224752.0cbd5807.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B830BD8.3090600@xxxxxxxxx> <20100223105959.a50dbe11.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Are there any downsides to Roland's patch as far as PARISC is concerned
> (apart from the loss of some functionality, of course)?
Kyle ACK'd my parisc patch, and my impression is he wants it to go in
and does not plan to work on the necessary arch support imminently.
I think the only visible effect of turning off HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
on parisc will be that /proc/pid/syscall is not available.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
