Hi Ingo, On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:07:10 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'll keep them in tip:master to get them tested, but note that i cannot push > any of these patches into linux-next until this is fixed, as linux-next > requires all architectures to build, with no regard to which architectures are > tested by kernel testers in practice. I merely expect people not to push known broken code into linux-next. linux-next breaks on all sorts of architectures all the time (check http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/). One of the reasons linux-next exists is so that all kernel developers don't have to build test on all architectures all the time. (And, yes, I know that linux-next doesn't build all architectures or all configs.) That being said, I will complain about breakages on some architectures more than others since they are in my personal builds (as opposed to the over night builds). That being said (:-)), I am sure that the PARISC guys would appreciate the original problem being fixed. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpqqsZU7vu9y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|