On 09/04/2009 08:33 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > >>> x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig' >> >> -tip testing found that this commit broke the UML build: >> >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile:52: >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86: No such file or directory >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target >> `/home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86'. Stop. >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > Hm, doesn't that mean that UML has always been broken for ARCH=x86? > Quite possible. ARCH=x86 hasn't exactly been widely used. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|