On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:27:18 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/04/2009 08:33 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > >>> x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig' > >> > >> -tip testing found that this commit broke the UML build: > >> > >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile:52: > >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86: No such file or directory > >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target > >> `/home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86'. Stop. > >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > > > Hm, doesn't that mean that UML has always been broken for ARCH=x86? > > > > Quite possible. ARCH=x86 hasn't exactly been widely used. what does ARCH=x86 mean? --- ~Randy LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|