* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/04/2009 08:33 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > >>> x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig' > >> > >> -tip testing found that this commit broke the UML build: > >> > >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile:52: > >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86: No such file or directory > >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target > >> `/home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86'. Stop. > >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > > > Hm, doesn't that mean that UML has always been broken for ARCH=x86? > > Quite possible. ARCH=x86 hasn't exactly been widely used. Note, i used 'make ARCH=um' so this commit cannot be pushed upwards until this problem is fixed. It could very well be some missing changes on the UML side. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|