Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:44:24 +0200
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200427074837.GC3451400@ulmo>
References: <6f07e5c8-7916-7ea2-2fe7-d05f8f011471@nvidia.com> <77a31b2f-f525-ba9e-f1ae-2b474465bde4@gmail.com> <470b4de4-e98a-1bdc-049e-6259ad603507@nvidia.com> <d2531fc1-b452-717d-af71-19497e14ef00@gmail.com> <a5198024-7273-74c4-b4f4-3a29d042bc36@nvidia.com> <f8fb1f7f-2497-033e-ff2c-c86c6caa9706@gmail.com> <fd1ca178-1ea3-851f-20a6-10bf00453ce3@nvidia.com> <a5734f19-254e-b6bc-e791-fa1ac63f11a4@gmail.com> <79f6560e-dbb5-0ae1-49f8-cf1cd95396ec@nvidia.com> <20200427074837.GC3451400@ulmo>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

> Wolfram, can you revert the following two patches for v5.7, please?
> 
> 	8814044fe0fa i2c: tegra: Synchronize DMA before termination
> 	a900aeac2537 i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time

Sure, will do!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Thierry Reding

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]