On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:41:04PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: [...] > I've decided to pull this in the interest of fairness. I'm taking the > Exynos cpu clock patches, which will need to be updated in the future to > use some new infrastructure for coordinating rate changes across > multiple clock nodes. I'm merging the EMC stuff with the same > expectation that it will need to migrate to the new infrastructure when > it becomes available and we'll get rid of clk_hw_reparent. > > Sound good? Sounds good, thanks Mike. I'm sure we'll find someone to update this when the framework changes are ready. Thierry
Attachment:
pgp60Jhudt_gN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
